When a minor enters into a contract, that contract is generally considered what?

When a minor enters into a contract, that contract is generally considered voidable. This means that the minor has the legal right to affirm or reject the contract. The rationale behind this principle is to protect minors from entering into agreements that they may not fully understand or comprehend due to their age and inexperience.

Furthermore, the law recognizes that individuals under the age of majority (typically 18 years old in most jurisdictions) may lack the capacity to make informed decisions about the obligations they assume through contracts. Therefore, minors can choose to void the contract at any time before they reach the age of majority or even a reasonable time after that.

This characteristic serves as a safeguard for minors, allowing them to escape agreements that could unfairly burden them or that they entered into without sufficient understanding. On reaching adulthood, a minor may also choose to ratify the contract, thereby making it enforceable.

The other options provided do not accurately describe the nature of contracts with minors. A contract being void would mean it has no legal effect from the outset, while unenforceable typically refers to valid contracts that cannot be enforced in court due to certain defenses. The term ratifiable does not accurately convey the unique legal status of contracts made by minors, as it refers to